What this is
We’re recruiting medical illustration reviewers to help ensure our visuals are:
- clinically accurate
- high-yield
- easy to learn from at a glance
This is not a paid role. It’s quality control on educational content that learners rely on.
The standard
Volunteer work here is flexible—but not casual.
You will:
- declare what you can commit to (hours, output), and
- be expected to meet that commitment reliably and communicate early if something changes.
What you’ll do
- Review diagrams/illustrations for anatomy, physiology, terminology, and logic.
- Catch errors (labels, arrows/flow, proportions, sequencing, misleading emphasis).
- Recommend simplifications that increase learning clarity (what to keep/remove/emphasise).
- Ensure visuals align with associated notes/quizzes.
Typical visuals you’ll review
- signs/symptoms summary diagrams
- anatomy → pathophysiology flow diagrams
- mechanisms of disease
- clinical frameworks (differentials, workups, red flags)
Who this suits
Minimum: final-year medical school proficiency (or equivalent).
Clinicians/educators who want to contribute to med ed
What “good” looks like
- You can spot what will confuse a learner
- You can explain why it’s wrong or unclear
- Your feedback makes the next revision fast and correct
Time commitment
- Flexible
- You pick how many reviews you can take on; we prioritise reliability
Location
This is a 100% remote role
How to apply
Submit:
- Your current role/stage
- A short note: why you want to contribute
- CV (optional)
- A sample: annotate one medical diagram (your own or ours) with the type of feedback you’d give
