Armando Hasudungan site title and tagline

Scaphoid Fracture

Overview

Scaphoid fracture is the most common carpal bone fracture, accounting for ~60–70% of all carpal fractures. It occurs most frequently in young adults (15–40 years) following a fall on the outstretched hand (FOOSH). The scaphoid’s tenuous blood supply predisposes to non-union and avascular necrosis, especially in proximal fractures. Early recognition is essential as delayed or missed diagnosis is common and may lead to long-term disability.

Definition

FOOSH: “Fall On Outstretched Hand,” common mechanism of wrist injuries.
Anatomical snuffbox: Depression between tendons of extensor pollicis longus and brevis; tenderness here is pathognomonic for scaphoid fracture.
Avascular necrosis (AVN): Bone death due to disruption of blood supply. A common site for avascular necrosis is to the scaphoid bone as well as the hip.
Non-union: Failure of bone fragments to heal within expected timeframe.

Anatomy & Physiology 

  • Scaphoid: Boat-shaped carpal bone on radial side of wrist; articulates with radius, trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, lunate.
  • Blood supply: Retrograde from dorsal carpal branch of radial artery → enters distally → supplies proximal pole last.
  • Clinical relevance: Proximal fractures at highest risk of AVN due to poor vascularity.

Proximal pole = poor healing → high risk AVN.

Aetiology and Risk Factors

Aetiology

  • Direct trauma: FOOSH (most common).
  • Less common: Punching injuries, direct blow to wrist.

Risk Factors

  • Young, active adults (sports injuries, falls).
  • Males > females.
  • High-energy trauma (e.g., motor vehicle accidents).

Pathophysiology 

  1. FOOSH → axial load transmitted through radial styloid.
  2. Scaphoid bone compressed against distal radius.
  3. Fracture occurs, most often at the waist (70%), less at proximal pole (20%) or distal pole (10%).
  4. Retrograde blood supply disrupted → risk of delayed healing or AVN (especially proximal).

Mechanism + vascular anatomy explains why scaphoid fracture is high risk despite being a “small bone.”

Clinical Manifestations

  • Wrist pain after FOOSH.
  • Clinical examination
    • Anatomical snuffbox tenderness (classic).
    • Tenderness over scaphoid tubercle (volar wrist).
    • Pain with axial compression of thumb.
    • ↓ wrist motion, swelling may be minimal.
  • Often subtle → patients may continue to use wrist.

Snuffbox tenderness = scaphoid fracture until proven otherwise.

Diagnosis

  • Clinical suspicion: FOOSH + snuffbox tenderness.
  • X-ray (wrist, scaphoid views): May be normal initially (up to 30% missed).
  • Repeat imaging: X-ray after 10–14 days if initial negative.
  • MRI (gold standard): Detects occult fractures within 24 hours.
  • CT scan: Best for assessing union and fracture displacement.

Differential Diagnosis

ConditionDifferentiating Features
Distal radius fractureMore swelling/deformity, visible on plain films
Wrist sprainNo bony tenderness, normal MRI
Scapholunate ligament injuryPain on Watson’s test, widening on imaging

Always immobilise if suspicion is high, even with negative initial X-ray.

Classification

  • Distal pole (~10%) – good healing, low risk AVN.
  • Waist (~70%) – most common.
  • Proximal pole (~20%) – poor healing, high risk AVN.

Treatment

  • Non-displaced distal/waist fractures: Immobilisation in thumb spica cast for 6–12 weeks.
  • Proximal or displaced fractures: Surgical fixation (percutaneous screw or open reduction).
  • Follow-up imaging: CT/MRI for union assessment.
  • Rehabilitation: Gradual mobilisation once union confirmed.

Distal = cast; Proximal = screw.

Complications & Prognosis

Complications

  • Non-union (5–15%).
  • Avascular necrosis (esp. proximal pole).
  • Osteoarthritis (SNAC wrist – Scaphoid Non-union Advanced Collapse).
  • Chronic pain, stiffness, ↓ grip strength.

Prognosis

  • Good if treated early
  • Poor outcomes with delayed diagnosis.

References

  1. Gelberman RH, Menon J. The vascularity of the scaphoid bone. J Hand Surg Am. 1980;5(5):508–13.
  2. Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities for suspected scaphoid fractures: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e3052.
  3. Fowler JR, Hughes TB. Scaphoid fractures. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34(1):37–50.
  4. Ibrahim T, Qureshi A, Sutton AJ, et al. Surgical vs non-surgical treatment of acute scaphoid fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD006770.
  5. Buijze GA, Ochtman L, Ring D. Management of scaphoid fractures in adults: what’s new? Injury. 2010;41(11):1120–8.

Related Content

Discussion

0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Table Of Contents

Become a member
Ready to take your education seriously?
Armando hasudungan brain logo
Armando Hasudungan
By Visualising Medicine
© 2026 Visualising Medicine. All rights reserved.
Become a member to access note taking
Orangise your medical learning
This is just one of the many AH community member perks
Become a member to access quizzes
Strengthen your medical knowledge
This is just one of the many AH community member perks
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x